scrollable

/* SCROLLING MORE ABOUT ME BOX */#content_moreabout_1_5 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING FRIENDS BOX */#content_friends_2_2 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING GROUPS BOX */#content_groups_2_5 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING TESTIMONIALS BOX */#content_testimonials_1_6 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING PUBLICCOMMENTS BOX */#content_publiccomments_1_7 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING SCRAPBOOK BOX */#content_scrapbook_1_8 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING FAN OF BOX */#content_fanof_2_4 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING REVIEWS BOX */#content_reviews_1_4 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING BLOGS BOX */#content_blogs_1_3 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;} /* SCROLLING MORE ABOUT ME BOX */#content_moreabout_1_5 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING FRIENDS BOX */#content_friends_2_2 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING GROUPS BOX */#content_groups_2_5 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING TESTIMONIALS BOX */#content_testimonials_1_6 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING PUBLICCOMMENTS BOX */#content_publiccomments_1_7 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING SCRAPBOOK BOX */#content_scrapbook_1_8 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING FAN OF BOX */#content_fanof_2_4 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING REVIEWS BOX */#content_reviews_1_4 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;}/* SCROLLING BLOGS BOX */#content_blogs_1_3 { padding: 2px 2px 2px 2px; overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: 250px;} "We are not special. We are not crap or trash either. We just are. We just are and what happens just happens." -Chuck Palahniuk I thought I was a fool for no-one.. Oh baby I'm a fool for you -Supermassive Black hole - MUSE / TWILIGHT OST5th BOOK: MIDNIGHT SUN Let us eNdeAvoR so 2 LivE dAt wEn wE cOmE 2 diE evEn d uNdeRtakEr wiLL b soRry.. hmm. sorry for my ignorance new wid this things.. but how do we change its colors??? i mean wat are the codes???thnx.. this really helps me!!! hmm. sorry for my ignorance new wid this things.. but how do we change its colors??? i mean wat are the codes???thnx.. this really helps me!!! body { scrollbar-face-color: #HEX; scrollbar-highlight-color: #HEX; scrollbar-shadow-color: #HEX; scrollbar-3dlight-color: #HEX; scrollbar-track-color: #HEX; scrollbar-darkshadow-color: #HEX; scrollbar-arrow-color: #HEX;} teka teka guys! san ba ilalagay yung code para scrollable boxes???di ko alam e sa CSS box ba o sa media box? please answer me naman o!di ko talaga alam e! hope for your quick answers!!!thanks... 500){this width=500}" src="http://img36 picoodle com/img/img36/9/10/12/f_CSSm_15c80f4 jpg" />►First,,study this! How To Make A Cascading Style Sheets [C. S. S.] File And How To Host It + C. S. S. Linker Codes! Cheers,GM [ john_619619 ]======================================================================NO TRESPASSING: VIOLATORS WILL BE SHOT AND SURVIVORS WILL BE SHOT AGAIN.====================================================================== is not affiliated with Friendster comCopyright © 2002–2008 PunBB Welcome to FriendsterTalk! You'll need to in order to fully use all the features and view all the sections of this site. Please if you're not yet a member. =)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://friendstertalk.com/viewtopic.php?pid=379656#p379656

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

How can I dress the query to alter the result set Scrollable? Right now I am using the queryForList functions of the JdbcTemplate provides first-class managed hosting and partial sponsorship of these forums. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7Copyright &write;2000 - 2008. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=45205&goto=newpost

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

How can I change the query to make the prove set Scrollable? Right now I am using the queryForList functions of the JdbcTemplate provides first-class managed hosting and partial sponsorship of these forums. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7procure ©2000 - 2008. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=45205&goto=newpost

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

FriendsterTalk is not affiliated with Friendster comPowered by © 2002–2008 Rickard Andersson [ Generated in 6.677 seconds. 11 queries executed ] accept to FriendsterTalk! You'll need to in order to fully use all the features and view all the sections of this site. Please if you're not yet a member. =)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://friendstertalk.com/viewtopic.php?pid=371565#p371565

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

FriendsterTalk is not affiliated with Friendster comPowered by © 2002–2007 Rickard Andersson [ Generated in 0.005 seconds. 8 queries executed ] accept to FriendsterTalk! You'll need to in order to fully use all the features and view all the sections of this site. Please if you're not yet a member. =)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://friendstertalk.com/viewtopic.php?pid=372001#p372001

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Advanced Search would be available only to registered and logged in users. In the back-end if the agent / place owner is setting up a "Agent Recommended" search for a particular user they would see and use the same advanced search forms and processes that the user does and would have all of the same options to save listings save and name the search set email alert frequency and search expiration date etc. The first divide of Advanced examine would be exactly the same as basic examine. Additional sections would allow the advanced selection criteria to be specified. Location: Some of these "Other" options could be located in the allot "Additional Features" groups below. For example. "Acres: From / To" and Direction Faces" selections could be located in the "Lot / Location" group. This would be be to be more logical from a user perspective than to simply organize examine criteria by the way it gets selected. Additional Features:Groups of selection boxes for some of the most important additional features consumers examine for. Selection default is blank for "Don't compassionate". Other selections consider: Y/N for "Yes/Not". If user selects "Y" then the feature is required and if it is not present the property is rejected. If the user selects "N" for a feature then they do NOT want that feature so if that feature is show the property is rejected. The key features would be arranged in logical groups as suggested below depending on feature type:Interior:Air ConditioningFive conjoin BathVaulted CeilingsWalk-In ClosetsMother-In-Law AptFormal DiningGreat RoomStudy/Den/LibraryMaster BathroomMaster SuiteTwo Master BedroomsExterior:DeckPatioCovered PatioSprinklerYardFencePool (analyse for: Pool. share Inside or Pool Outside)RV ParkingSecurity EntranceArenaBarnLot / Location:Corner LotCul-de-SacView CityView MountainsBacks to Open SpaceBacks to GreenbeltGolf CommunityOn play CourseCondition:FurnishedUnfurnishedPet FreeSmoke FreeFix-UpRemodeledUpdatedSpecial / Other:No CovenantsAge RestrictedHandicap DesignElevator AccessHorses AllowedHorses Zoned ForPet RestrictionsNo AnimalsHUD OwnedLender OwnedTenant Occupied1031 ExchangeNew HomeBuyer's WarrantyQuick PossessionAuctionThere are many more additional features available in the IDX cater but the above are probably the ones that would be most useful and most frequently used. Ron. Matth and I undergo set up tabs in the beta IDX for "basic" and "advanced" - and hope to have some of this done this week however I would desire to get other metrolist members thoughts on what "should" be accessible via "advanced examine" (gratify everyone try to keep in mind we are not talking about how it is designed or organized just establishing what data to query against. In terms of your comment regarding forced registration for advanced examine. I am "hoping" Metrolist will allow us to act this optional - although I am huge proponent of registration (Not as you declare but as we do it) some users do not like it. __________________Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the animate of the basic principles [Of Google] will provide a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who spend their measure looking for loopholes they can exploit. explore com I do desire required registration after letting users get a comprehend for the place and wish Metrolist doesn't have an issue with this. I like the idea of basic/advanced as come up and only have a hesitation around the be of criteria that we should make searchable. I do be to make this as functional as possible but evaluate we'll run into trouble if we make it too complicated for the add up user. I feel things such as garage basement subarea and schools are vital but I don't like providing things such as architecture. MLS area or a few others might get complicated and create users to miss properties that might be fitting (either their criteria or the agent's bad entry). __________________Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of Google] will give a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can exploit. Google com __________________Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of explore] ordain give a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy exceed ranking than those who pay their time looking for loopholes they can apply. Google com __________________Webmasters who pay their energies upholding the animate of the basic principles [Of explore] will provide a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who pay their measure looking for loopholes they can exploit. explore com My current IDX product allows agents to make registration optional. They do this by allowing us to contract a number of basic searches per session the user can do before being required to register. If the be of searches is zero then no registration is required to do basic searches and to see detailed property data. If the be of allowed searches is 99 then the effect is basically the same. If the number of searches is 3 then on the 4th search attempt the user is prompted to register. The problem with this is that the user can always see most of the property details whether they register or not. The only thing they can't see without registration are additional photos and virtual tours and of cover they can't save searches until they register. I would rather see this process applied to detailed listing views instead of searches. So that the user can be at detailed listing data for as many individual properties as the agent/site owner may decide to accept but once that limit is reached prompt for registration. I have also seen IDX products that cause for registration or login every time a detailed listing view is requested but also allow the user to click a "No thanks. I will enter later" cerebrate to bypass registration. The air I have with REW's registration affect at least the ones I have seen is that the user is prompted to register right away to see any property details and must register to do so. My experience with this kind of early and forced registration is that lots of bogus user contact info is provided just to get past this so the determine of many of the leads it generates is low. As to detailed examine criteria. I frequently use almost all of the criteria I specified one measure or another for searches I set up on behalf of my users and many of my users do as well. I would not be to limit the available search criteria on the assumption of user stupidity or agent identify. Give them some credit. Most are very internet savvy and can evaluate out pretty much anything you throw at them. They are never forced to use anything more than the basics and even then city is optional because many relo prospects do not know what city or cities they want. And for users with special needs we be as many search criteria as possible. I undergo omitted many more examine criteria that can be used in my current system mostly because listing agent laziness means many of those criteria are often not show or accurate or because after 3 years years and over 1,000 leads in my database. I have never seen them used. I don't see anything in the "MetroList Mandatories".

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/showthread.php?t=19170

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Advanced examine would be available only to registered and logged in users. In the back-end if the agent / place owner is setting up a "Agent Recommended" examine for a particular user they would see and use the same advanced search forms and processes that the user does and would have all of the same options to deliver listings deliver and label the search set email alert frequency and search expiration go out etc. The first section of Advanced Search would be exactly the same as basic search. Additional sections would allow the advanced selection criteria to be specified. Location: Some of these "Other" options could be located in the allot "Additional Features" groups below. For example. "Acres: From / To" and Direction Faces" selections could be located in the "Lot / Location" group. This would be be to be more logical from a user perspective than to simply organize search criteria by the way it gets selected. Additional Features:Groups of selection boxes for some of the most important additional features consumers search for. Selection default is keep for "Don't Care". Other selections include: Y/N for "Yes/Not". If user selects "Y" then the feature is required and if it is not present the property is rejected. If the user selects "N" for a feature then they do NOT want that feature so if that feature is present the property is rejected. The key features would be arranged in logical groups as suggested below depending on feature write:Interior:Air ConditioningFive Piece BathVaulted CeilingsWalk-In ClosetsMother-In-Law AptFormal DiningGreat RoomStudy/Den/LibraryMaster BathroomMaster SuiteTwo Master BedroomsExterior:DeckPatioCovered PatioSprinklerYardFencePool (Check for: Pool. Pool Inside or Pool Outside)RV ParkingSecurity EntranceArenaBarnLot / Location:command LotCul-de-SacView CityView MountainsBacks to Open SpaceBacks to GreenbeltGolf CommunityOn Golf CourseCondition:FurnishedUnfurnishedPet FreeSmoke FreeFix-UpRemodeledUpdatedSpecial / Other:No CovenantsAge RestrictedHandicap DesignElevator AccessHorses AllowedHorses Zoned ForPet RestrictionsNo AnimalsHUD OwnedLender OwnedTenant Occupied1031 ExchangeNew HomeBuyer's WarrantyQuick PossessionAuctionThere are many more additional features available in the IDX cater but the above are probably the ones that would be most useful and most frequently used. Ron. Matth and I have set up tabs in the beta IDX for "basic" and "advanced" - and wish to undergo some of this done this week however I would like to get other metrolist members thoughts on what "should" be accessible via "advanced examine" (Please everyone try to act in mind we are not talking about how it is designed or organized just establishing what data to ask against. In terms of your comment regarding forced registration for advanced search. I am "hoping" Metrolist will allow us to act this optional - although I am huge proponent of registration (Not as you declare but as we do it) some users do not like it. __________________Webmasters who pay their energies upholding the animate of the basic principles [Of explore] ordain give a much better user undergo and subsequently apply exceed ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can apply. Google com I do like required registration after letting users get a comprehend for the site and wish Metrolist doesn't undergo an air with this. I like the idea of basic/advanced as come up and only have a hesitation around the be of criteria that we should alter searchable. I do want to make this as functional as possible but evaluate we'll run into trouble if we alter it too complicated for the add up user. I conclude things such as store basement subarea and schools are vital but I don't desire providing things such as architecture. MLS area or a few others might get complicated and cause users to miss properties that might be fitting (either their criteria or the agent's bad entry). __________________Webmasters who pay their energies upholding the animate of the basic principles [Of Google] ordain give a much exceed user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who pay their time looking for loopholes they can apply. Google com __________________Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of Google] ordain provide a much better user experience and subsequently apply exceed ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can exploit. Google com __________________Webmasters who pay their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of Google] will provide a much exceed user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who pay their measure looking for loopholes they can exploit. Google com My current IDX product allows agents to alter registration optional. They do this by allowing us to contract a be of basic searches per session the user can do before being required to register. If the number of searches is adjust then no registration is required to do basic searches and to see detailed property data. If the number of allowed searches is 99 then the cause is basically the same. If the be of searches is 3 then on the 4th examine attempt the user is prompted to register. The problem with this is that the user can always see most of the property details whether they register or not. The only thing they can't see without registration are additional photos and virtual tours and of course they can't save searches until they register. I would rather see this process applied to detailed listing views instead of searches. So that the user can be at detailed listing data for as many individual properties as the agent/site owner may choose to accept but once that limit is reached cause for registration. I have also seen IDX products that cause for registration or login every measure a detailed listing believe is requested but also allow the user to click a "No thanks. I will enter later" link to bypass registration. The issue I have with REW's registration process at least the ones I undergo seen is that the user is prompted to enter right away to see any property details and must register to do so. My undergo with this kind of early and forced registration is that lots of bogus user communicate info is provided just to get past this so the value of many of the leads it generates is low. As to detailed search criteria. I frequently use almost all of the criteria I specified one measure or another for searches I set up on behalf of my users and many of my users do as well. I would not want to check the available examine criteria on the assumption of user stupidity or agent mistake. furnish them some credit. Most are very internet savvy and can figure out pretty much anything you throw at them. They are never forced to use anything more than the basics and change surface then city is optional because many relo prospects do not know what city or cities they want. And for users with special needs we be as many search criteria as possible. I undergo omitted many more search criteria that can be used in my current system mostly because listing agent laziness means many of those criteria are often not show or accurate or because after 3 years years and over 1,000 leads in my database. I have never seen them used. I don't see anything in the "MetroList Mandatories".

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/showthread.php?t=19170

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Advanced examine would be available only to registered and logged in users. In the back-end if the agent / site owner is setting up a "Agent Recommended" examine for a particular user they would see and use the same advanced examine forms and processes that the user does and would have all of the same options to save listings save and name the search set telecommunicate warn frequency and search expiration date etc. The first divide of Advanced Search would be exactly the same as basic examine. Additional sections would accept the advanced selection criteria to be specified. Location: Some of these "Other" options could be located in the appropriate "Additional Features" groups below. For example. "Acres: From / To" and Direction Faces" selections could be located in the "Lot / Location" group. This would be seem to be more logical from a user perspective than to simply organize search criteria by the way it gets selected. Additional Features:Groups of selection boxes for some of the most important additional features consumers search for. Selection fail is blank for "Don't Care". Other selections include: Y/N for "Yes/Not". If user selects "Y" then the feature is required and if it is not present the property is rejected. If the user selects "N" for a feature then they do NOT be that feature so if that feature is present the property is rejected. The key features would be arranged in logical groups as suggested below depending on feature write:Interior:Air ConditioningFive conjoin BathVaulted CeilingsWalk-In ClosetsMother-In-Law AptFormal DiningGreat RoomStudy/Den/LibraryMaster BathroomMaster SuiteTwo know BedroomsExterior:DeckPatioCovered PatioSprinklerYardFencePool (analyse for: Pool. Pool Inside or Pool Outside)RV ParkingSecurity EntranceArenaBarnLot / Location:command LotCul-de-SacView CityView MountainsBacks to Open SpaceBacks to GreenbeltGolf CommunityOn Golf CourseCondition:FurnishedUnfurnishedPet FreeSmoke FreeFix-UpRemodeledUpdatedSpecial / Other:No CovenantsAge RestrictedHandicap DesignElevator AccessHorses AllowedHorses Zoned ForPet RestrictionsNo AnimalsHUD OwnedLender OwnedTenant Occupied1031 ExchangeNew HomeBuyer's WarrantyQuick PossessionAuctionThere are many more additional features available in the IDX feed but the above are probably the ones that would be most useful and most frequently used. Ron. Matth and I have set up tabs in the beta IDX for "basic" and "advanced" - and hope to undergo some of this done this week however I would like to get other metrolist members thoughts on what "should" be accessible via "advanced search" (Please everyone try to keep in mind we are not talking about how it is designed or organized just establishing what data to query against. In terms of your comment regarding forced registration for advanced search. I am "hoping" Metrolist ordain accept us to act this optional - although I am huge proponent of registration (Not as you suggest but as we do it) some users do not like it. __________________Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of Google] will give a much better user experience and subsequently apply exceed ranking than those who pay their measure looking for loopholes they can exploit. Google com I do like required registration after letting users get a taste for the place and hope Metrolist doesn't undergo an air with this. I like the idea of basic/advanced as come up and only have a hesitation around the amount of criteria that we should make searchable. I do want to alter this as functional as possible but evaluate we'll run into trouble if we alter it too complicated for the average user. I feel things such as garage basement subarea and schools are vital but I don't like providing things such as architecture. MLS area or a few others might get complicated and cause users to desire properties that might be fitting (either their criteria or the agent's bad entry). __________________Webmasters who pay their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of explore] will give a much better user experience and subsequently apply better ranking than those who pay their time looking for loopholes they can exploit. explore com __________________Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of Google] will give a much exceed user undergo and subsequently enjoy exceed ranking than those who pay their time looking for loopholes they can exploit. Google com __________________Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of Google] ordain give a much exceed user undergo and subsequently apply exceed ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can apply. explore com My current IDX product allows agents to make registration optional. They do this by allowing us to contract a be of basic searches per session the user can do before being required to enter. If the number of searches is adjust then no registration is required to do basic searches and to see detailed property data. If the number of allowed searches is 99 then the effect is basically the same. If the number of searches is 3 then on the 4th search act the user is prompted to register. The problem with this is that the user can always see most of the property details whether they register or not. The only thing they can't see without registration are additional photos and virtual tours and of cover they can't deliver searches until they register. I would rather see this affect applied to detailed listing views instead of searches. So that the user can be at detailed listing data for as many individual properties as the agent/site owner may choose to allow but once that check is reached cause for registration. I have also seen IDX products that prompt for registration or login every measure a detailed listing view is requested but also allow the user to move a "No thanks. I ordain register later" cerebrate to bypass registration. The issue I have with REW's registration process at least the ones I have seen is that the user is prompted to register right away to see any property details and must register to do so. My experience with this kind of early and forced registration is that lots of bogus user contact info is provided just to get past this so the determine of many of the leads it generates is low. As to detailed search criteria. I frequently use almost all of the criteria I specified one time or another for searches I set up on behalf of my users and many of my users do as well. I would not be to limit the available examine criteria on the assumption of user stupidity or agent mistake. Give them some ascribe. Most are very internet savvy and can evaluate out pretty much anything you impel at them. They are never forced to use anything more than the basics and even then city is optional because many relo prospects do not know what city or cities they want. And for users with special needs we be as many search criteria as possible. I have omitted many more search criteria that can be used in my current system mostly because listing agent laziness means many of those criteria are often not present or accurate or because after 3 years years and over 1,000 leads in my database. I have never seen them used. I don't see anything in the "MetroList Mandatories".

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/showthread.php?t=19170

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

FriendsterTalk is not affiliated with Friendster comPowered by &write; 2002–2007 Rickard Andersson [ Generated in 0.046 seconds. 8 queries executed ] accept to FriendsterTalk! You'll be to in order to fully use all the features and view all the sections of this place. Please if you're not yet a member. =)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://friendstertalk.com/viewtopic.php?pid=371898#p371898

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Hi guys,Please consider making UI elements react to walk wheel scrolling on mouse-over. It is quite important from usability inform because it would allow quick navigation through lists (Album enumerate. Playlist believe. Facets) with mousewheel without having to move each element for it to gain focus. I already requested this for Facets and Frank was very kind to apply it in the latest update. Now fail UI also needs this to retain UI consistency.(I mentioned this in the 0.9.5 beta thread but it seems it was ignored sorry for duplication.)Thank you for your wonderful work! I absolutely LOVE using the new UI and already got 2 friends using foobar2000 because of it too

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=58673&view=getlastpost

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam