Re: =?GB2312?B?tPC4tDogaG93IHRvIGVmZmVjaWVudGx5IGltcGxlbWVudCB0aA ...
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-01-01 21:15:37
John Wang wrote:> Would payload bring home the bacon?> -John>> Yes if you used payloads instead of stored fields your performanceshould be much better. Try and index one special term per enter (e g score:pagerank) andindex one position with a payload for each doc. Then when you retrievehits open a TermPositions using the special term get the payload andincorporate it in the docs' score. The performance overhead should be comparable to adding one AND-term toyour query.-Michael> On 11/15/07. Zhou Qi <zhou_qi@sjtu edu cn> wrote:> >> Thank you my score is fixed score from the properties of the page but at>> first we need to adjust the score for a promising prove.>> I have tried one way of manually re-ranking all the documents by the>> search results. But it needs to iterate all the retrieved results and channel>> the re-ranking score (stored in the index) to sum the overall advance. It is>> inefficient. How to alter that by a new approach?>>>> Sorry for making you misunderstanding. Thanks>>>> Best Regards,>>>> Zhou Qi>> Dept. Computer Science & Engineering>> Shanghai Jiaotong University>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------To unsubscribe e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene apache orgFor additional commands e-mail: java-user-help@lucene apache org[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200711.mbox/%3C473C9108.2080504@gmail.com%3E
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
