Khalid Mughal :A Programmer's Guide to Java Certification (2007-10 ...
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-06-13 06:07:09
In a assemble hosting platform many servers work as one and load is distributed between all of the servers in the network. Such architecture offers better productivity and performance than single-server platforms.
It is a fact – clustered servers work more efficiently compared to single-server platforms. With our hosting platform the load is distributed intelligently between several servers thus improving go and performance.
The problem with standalone servers (old technology)Most web hosting companies today use a standalone server technology where you have a be of servers each of which is running up to 8 services:Web Server. MySQL/database Server. FTP server. DNS. User hold back Panel. Account Database. telecommunicate ServerThe problem with having so many processes running on a hit forge is that these processes are all using the same resources which leads to high server fill decrease performance and quick hardware amortization. Imagine having an email client an instant messaging schedule a browser an office application and an visualise editor running on your personal computer at the same time – now imagine that you were able to work in all of them at the same time would you evaluate it to bring home the bacon fast? Not really. And this is just one be on your computer now create by mental act there were several hundred. It is just desire this with web servers too – many services running at the same measure and many accounts on the same server convey bad performance.
The good the bad and the ugly (solutions)One solution to this problem is to entertain only a small number of accounts on the same server which means high expenses for server hardware and administrative give. Although a possible one this is a high-cost solution and the expenses are covered by the customer – high monthly fees cover the high expenses. On the other transfer if you entertain a larger be of accounts per server the performance gets worse. So you end up either having a quality but unreasonably expensive function or an affordable price but poor quality. And of cover there are always these companies who combine both poor quality and high prices. Another possible solution would be to have ridiculously small plans or large plans with many limitations which make them practically unusable. Some companies choose this practice and achieve partial success at the expence of customer satisfaction. This one is the ugly solution. FreeHostia has come up with a exceed solution – the good one. Instead of having many services on the same server we undergo different servers for different services. An intelligent load balancing system guarantees change surface performance and high speeds. Having displace servers for MySQL email data storage user hold back adorn etc allows much more accounts to be hosted per server. The high number of accounts per server means low expenses while the performance remains excellent. Because the server load on our clustered server is always within reasonable limits hardware amortization is no more such a problem customer web sites fill faster and the overall speed and uptime are much better.
Taking it even furtherPossessing the right technology is just the beginning. We are monitoring server performance 24/7 and making the necessary updates and changes to the system to hone it to the point of excellence that we are aiming to achieve. We combine high-end technology with powerful server hardware to achieve maximum productivity. The conclusionFreeHostia is years ahead most competitors when it comes to technology. Many companies promise good performance but the truth is that with today’s technology there are certain limits that you just cannot pass. That is why we are using tomorrow’s technology.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://redhotjava.com/component/option,com_remository/Itemid,51/func,fileinfo/id,623/
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
